|
AWARDS DATABASE
All of the winners, all of the nominees, all of the awards shows.
|
No SAG nom for Depp:
"Sweeney" and "Atonement" are December releases, apparently a bad-luck month this year for flicks hoping to compete for SAG recognition.
(Leah Gallo / AP) Recent Columns
Pete Hammond is film critic for Maxim Magazine and Maximonline.com. He contributes to "Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide" and hosts Q&A screenings with top Oscar contenders for KCET Cinema Series and Variety. He appears frequently on TV as a pop-culture pundit and has been a producer for "Entertainment Tonight," "Extra," "Access Hollywood" and AMC - American Movie Classics network. Pete's "Note on a Season" column appears weekly on Thursdays exclusively on TheEnvelope.com.
Interestingly, both "Sweeney" and "Atonement" are December releases, apparently a bad-luck month this year for flicks hoping to compete for SAG recognition. It's an interesting wrinkle, since the SAG nomination voting and announcement dates were moved up by two weeks to adjust to the shortened awards season.
This would appear to make DVD screener availability and those all-important SAG nominating committee screenings and Q&As even more vitally important than ever in reaching the voters. "Todd," which opens Friday, still has not sent DVD screeners out, while "Atonement's" December release could have harmed it with SAG despite the fact that screeners were in hand. Nearly all of today's nominees did in-person screening Q&As for SAG, some more than once, and the in-person touch clearly seems to have paid off. Among those who didn't – or weren't able to – appear for Q&As (at least in L.A.) were two thought-to-be major contenders, Johnny Depp and Keira Knightley. Neither actor was nominated by SAG. As for those long-shot performances that were screened and released earlier in the season, many are now seeing their 2007 nomination stock now soar. That would include Viggo Mortensen for "Eastern Promises," who has now racked up SAG, Globe and BFCA nominations. The same applies to Ryan Gosling for "Lars and the Real Girl," Emile Hirsch for "Wild," Cate Blanchett's "Elizabeth" reprisal (despite the flop of the film) and Ruby Dee, a beloved 83-year-old veteran who notched SAG's ensemble and supporting actress for "American Gangster" yet has never received an Oscar nomination. This year's SAG awards ceremony, airing on TNT and TBS on Jan. 27, should certainly be interesting, but at least we know it's happening and we will be able to see it. The striking WGA, in solidarity with SAG and thankful for the actors' unwavering support out on the picket lines, has granted a waiver to the awards ceremony so actors can be comfortable showing up knowing they will not have to cross picket lines. The 2007 Critics Choice awards from the Broadcast Critics Assn. will kick off this portion of the season on Jan. 7, and also is not threatened by picketing. The organization's new broadcast outlet, VH1 -- along with the show's production entity, Bob Bain Prods. -- are not signatories to WGA and therefore not considered "struck" companies. This could actually increase star turnout for both the SAG and BFCA parties since publicists will definitely want exposure for their contenders during crucial voting periods. Uncertainty about other award shows could fuel bigger turnout for those award shows that are unaffected by the strike. The big questions remain, of course, should the strike still be going on: What are the fates of Golden Globes on Jan. 13 and the Oscars on Feb. 24? WGA has not granted waivers to either, and all sorts of rumors are flying fast and furiously about what will happen. Depending on who you listen to (and it changes hourly), the Globes will sign an interim agreement with the guild and proceed as usual, or the awards will be canceled, postponed, telecast with only nominees and no star presenters, go on as scheduled without a telecast, or held at Alec Baldwin's New York apartment (hey, he volunteered it). How a scaled down or non-existent Globes could affect the rest of awards season is interesting since it is said to be so influential, not to mention a great way to show off potential Oscar acceptance speeches to a roomful of academy members. Some feel the WGA would be wise to embrace both the Globes and the Oscars as it will give on-stage presenters and winners the opportunity to show support for their cause on nationally televised bully pulpits. One very high level producer -- a double Golden Globe nominee this year -- told us yesterday she thinks it is unfair of WGA to grant a waiver only to SAG and not the rest since all these shows are supposed to be a celebration of achievement, a time to focus on what the industry should really stand for. This insider has heard the Globes will definitely go on, most likely as a private affair, meaning without the huge NBC TV audience that studio Oscar consultants count on each year. It could be especially ironic if the Globes suffer due to the policies of the WGA, since the Hollywood Foreign Press Association is, by its nature, made up of people who make a living by writing. A lot of the HFPA's multimillion-dollar license fee that NBC pays goes each year to charitable foundations that help the entertainment industry. As for the Oscars, producer Gil Cates says there is zero chance that show will not go on – strike or no strike. And quite frankly, they always do. A world without the Oscar ceremony is not one awards insiders want to contemplate. Then again, this is coming from the same Gil Cates who is a chief negotiator for the DGA, another union about to start talks with the studios on a new contract. It goes on and on, doesn't it? Just like The Season. Happy Holidays. |
|

